
In the late 1940s, a heartbreaking image showing four children for sale was published in newspapers across the United States. A woman named Lucille Chalifoux and her husband, Ray faced the challenges of being out of work and on the verge of eviction and seemingly had no other option. However, there may have been more to it than what the public had been led to believe. Eventually, the children would have the opportunity to tell their stories.
Children for Sale
On August 5, 1948, an advert was posted in the Vidette-Messenger in Valparaiso, Indiana, that showed a mother, with her back turned and her head in her hands, seemingly distraught. Meanwhile, her four young children sat on the steps behind her, next to a sign that read: “4 children for sale. Inquire within.” The announcement eventually made its way into newspapers all over the U.S. From New York and Pennsylvania to Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Then, it made its way into newspapers in Iowa, Texas, and a few other states.
Getting to Know the Children for Sale
Alternatively, they have managed to connect with Lana’s family in the hopes of learning all they can about the life lived by their oldest sister. Although it’s sad that they never did get to reconnect with their older sister, Rae, and Milton had the opportunity to spend time together throughout their lives. Although there is no clear evidence of the children being purchased or adopted, Rae and Milton were sent to go live with John and Ruth Zoeteman in DeMotte, Indiana. According to Rae, Lucille sold her for $2. Apparently so, she could have bingo money because the man she was involved with wanted nothing to do with her children. So, she put the children for sale.


Meeting LucilleMilton, like his sister, also met their birth mother long after she put her children for sale. In 1970, he stayed with her for a month. However, he got into a fight with her husband at the time, and the husband was arrested. As a result, Lucille threw Milton out. “My birth mother, she never did love me,” he said. “She didn’t apologize for selling me. She hated me so much that she didn’t care.”Sue EllenSue Ellen also had no record of her adoption but believed she had been adopted “legitimately” by a couple whose last name was Johnson. Sadly, she passed away from lung disease in 2013 but not before reuniting with Rae. “It’s fabulous. I love her,” Sue Ellen wrote of her sister. In contrast, “She needs to be in hell burning,” she wrote of her biological mom.The Youngest to GoTheir youngest brother, David, born Bedford Chalifoux, was not one of the children for sale. Instead, he was taken from his mother and put into the custody of the McDaniels, who were unable to have a child. “I had bed bug bites all over my body,” he said. “I guess it was a pretty bad environment.” His adoption records state that his biological father had left them, and he “does not return to his home because of a criminal record against him in Cook County, Illinois.”
